Is It OK to Critique the Obama Administration?

by Dr. Boyce Watkins, Your Black World

Today, I had a 30 minute conversation with Rev. Al Sharpton.  During our discussion (which I will cite to make sure that his point of view is accurately reflected – I’ve already expressed my sentiments in favor of the other perspective), Sharpton brought up his recent interactions with Prof. Cornel West, who has been a vocal critic of the Obama Administration as of late.  According to Dr. West, the administration has neglected to implement policy that reflects the issues that reach to the core of the needs of black, brown, poor and working class communities.   I agree with West that a deeper examination of these concerns must take place in order for us to find ways to solve very serious problems being faced by “us.”

Rev. Sharpton makes accurate points that West’s observations are tainted by the professor’s personal bias against the president.  One can hardly imagine Cornel attacking President Obama had he continued to be an insider to the administration.  At the very least, West made a serious mistake by mentioning his grief over not getting tickets to the inauguration.  Additionally, Cornel is haunted by his close friendship with Tavis Smiley, who is viewed by many as a strong Hillary Clinton supporter with almost no interest in seeing President Obama succeed.  The righteous indignation that my brother Cornel expresses toward President Obama’s loyalty to “Wall Street oligarchs and corporate plutocrats” would never be repeated toward his friend Tavis Smiley, who has taken money from seemingly every corporation who has offered it.

With all this said, I see a productive light at the end of the tunnel, as Sharpton and West spoke on the phone this week to work things out.  I suggested to Rev. Sharpton that he follow up on the idea of he and West engaging in public endeavors to remind the world that they are on the same page.  Also, in disagreement with Princeton Professor Eddie Glaude, I don’t see this battle between West and Sharpton as a W.E.B. Du Bois/Booker T. Washington moment.   I am still trying to determine, however, if I agree with Sharpton, who argues that this is a Martin Luther King/Malcolm X moment.  My conclusion at this point?  This is a Cornel West/ Al Sharpton moment, which deserves its own unique place in black history, and I respect it as such.

During our conversation today, Rev. Sharpton made two additional points with which I agreed and plan to hold him to in the future: First, he argues that there is room to speak up on issues that matter to African Americans, even if there is dissent within the black community.  Such voices are part of the Democratic process.  Secondly, the manner by which Professor West addressed his concerns may not have been politically-productive.  By name-calling and discussing his personal issues with Obama, West opened the door for his critics to undermine everything he was trying to say.

I see the spirited debate between West and Sharpton to be one that can actually create progress, no differently from the good cop-bad cop approaches used by Martin Luther King and Malcolm X.  Donna Brazile said it best when she mentioned that critiques by men like Cornel West allow her to be more effective as a Washington insider.  So, not only should the voice of Cornel West continue to exist, it should be amplified.

In the video below, I speak to Professor Wilmer Leon of Howard University.  Dr. Leon helps me to further understand the Obama/West divide, as well the methods by which we can intelligently engage the political process in a way that helps us to reach our goals.   No disrespect to those who have agendas for other constituencies, but I argue that it is time that black people achieve gains that are unique to us and not just a by-product of politicians working to help somebody else (as Melissa Harris-Perry attempted to persuade me that the repeal of Don’t Ask Don’t Tell, the implementation of the Lilly Ledbetter Act and Immigration Reform were somehow tangentially part of the black agenda).  Black people should not have to be passengers in the car of American politics.  It’s also OK to sometimes allow black people to drive.   The video is below.

 

Dr. Boyce Watkins is a Professor at Syracuse University and founder of the Your Black World coalition.  To have Dr. Boyce commentary delivered to your email, please click here.

 

More From Your Black World:



0saves
If you enjoyed this post, please consider leaving a comment or subscribing to the RSS feed to have future articles delivered to your feed reader.
  • Anonymous

    It should still be understood that we are a people divided by slavery from our lands then from each other. We were turned against each other early on, and we were treated as third class citizens with a bullet then, and second class citizens with a bullet now.

    We should understand that we never had a chance for cohesiveness in this vapid environment where we are unable to love ourselves, let alone our children. There is always exceptions to the rule, but as a people we remain in denial despite the obviously continuing abuses we must  suffer within and without.

    Many of us are unable to recognize the political climate we are subjected to and the social structure that was built on manifest destiny and continues this drive in a most vile and capricious way. This country is filled with men who can be bought and sold at once. The one percent who own practically the whole world controls all government officials and all offices, which causes a very unsafe and unfair dilemma for all who are not wealthy and lucky.

    All politicians are subjected to scrutiny before they are allowed to continue their realms as “leaders”. They are fully bought and paid for with our monies, but not by us in particular. All politicians are in a class that they must adhere, and conform to, as they serve the ‘Elite’ class, and do its bidding. If the elite want a special person bad enough nothing will stop that person from serving them in any particular office, especially the presidential office.

    The people of this country are left to assume that their politicians are in office to serve them and that these politicians are generally fair minded men with honesty and god-fearing ideals as their base, yet that could not be further from the truth. We are not allowed the truth and so we are left to our assumptions which are generally wrong.

    The evidence is all around us that we are not being served properly by our politicians, nor are they trying to serve us, but a more wealthier and powerful group. Our eyes and ears show us how in practically every way we must fight for the very air we breath and water we drink thanks to these wayward souls we place our trust in. Possessive greed is the order of the day and those without greed and desire for wealth are attacked at every turn when they speak for the masses. The signs that we have horrible people sweet talking their positions amongst our leadership is represented in almost every facet of our failing livelihoods, and social structure.

    We should understand that politicians only serve the people as an afterthought, and their allegiance is to the people who own, and demand everything, including the reserves from our tax coffers. We should understand that no politicians including presidents, work in favor of the populace, yet are subject to political etc.,destruction if they don’t keep the status-quo happy. 

    The fact that we are a divided populace with an in-cohesive, psychosocially destraught ‘black’ population, which continues to be attacked and ravished by an overbearing, and socially ignorant ‘white’ social mindset, that is bent on keeping us “in our place”, makes it that much more difficult for the bulk of us to understand that it is useless to choose politicians when they are not actually our choice to begin with, and when they are not in the business of serving “We The People”, but to continue the prosperity and “Manifest Destiny” of a small elite group, and at our expense!

    Men like Cornel West, Noam Chomsky, Howard Zinn, Randal Robinson, et al, understand this, but few understand how severe our politician’s actions against us are. These men are also not politicians, yet still believe in this very corrupt political process we all depend upon. We are not being served by Obama or Hillary or any of them, It is more like they are serving us up!

  • Dintellect

    It is okay to critique the Administration with qualification that Obama is not Black Jesus. It is important to understand how our system of government works before one places blame for the current plight of colored America. I say the blame is closer to home than people want to admit. Therefore the answers are also found closer to home than people want to accept.

  • Joseph L. Bass, Ed.D.

    I agree with a lot of what Wizardg has to say in comments related to “Is It OK to Critique the Obama Administration?”.  But what bothers me about many of Dr. Watkins comments in his essay and many other essays and comments in Your Black World  is that there is far too much thinking about black people and white people being against each other.   
     
    First, from a historically point of view, the Abolitionist/Civil Rights movement was started hundreds of years ago by white Europeans and white Americans so that we can provide equal opportunities for all racial and ethnic groups.  The American Civil War was started, fought, and won primarily by northern whites.  Hundreds of thousands of northern whites died fighting to get the 13th, 14th, and 15th amendments adopted into the US Constitution.  I’m old enough to have been involved in civil rights efforts in the 1950’s and 60’s.  I know we, blacks and whites together, made important progress during those years.  But some time in the 1970’s all of this got reframed as a blacks against whites issue, and that is when our progress slowed way down.  And that is where we are today – not making as much progress as we want.
     
    I think Wizardg has some good comments.  But I think our Wall Street financial/banking institutions have far too much influence on our Presidents and members of Congress.  Too much of what is legislated and enforced is meant for the Wall Street financial/banking institutions and not for the general American population, regardless of race, color, creed, etc.  We the common Americans are allowing ourselves to be divided and conflicted with each other (black, white, brown, Asian) when we need to focus on our common future together as an American e pluribus unum (out of many – one) people.
     
    And I think all of this is the source of black Americans being disappointed in the Obama presidency.  Blacks thought having a black president was going to result in change, but Obama is no different from Bush One and Two, Clinton, etc.  The two major political parties spend all their advertising money on campaign ads that foster separation and conflict among us and we keep falling for it, voting for and electing the people that the Wall Streeters want to have elected. 
     
    I continue to spend my time writing about these issues and hope that eventually we (blacks, whites, browns, and Asians) cam come back together like the 1950’s and 60’s and make progress together.  What do you all out there think about this?  Dr. Watkins what do you think about it?   Joseph L. Bass, Ed.D.

  • Brook

    For some reason, black people think that talking about President Obama is somehow going to hurt him.  We should be criticizing and using our voice to get what we want.  That’s what jews and other groups do.  Stop being so ignorant! 

  • Anonymous

    I have always maintained Cornel West is wrong to criticize President Obama. That’s where we Blacks lack wisdom. Cornel knows we are already disadvantaged group and therefore need support one another. But he, through jealous like Alan Keyes, jumps to discredit one of his own. The other groups enjoy that. And I have witnessed such incidents in my own town. Some Blacks do not want other Blacks advance.  It’s jealous, that is bothering him that Obama and not him is the President. I am asking Cornel to intro-inspect himself and stop such behavior. Enough is enough. We have to come together.

  • ALICIA BANKS
  • Cleo….

    Yes, we can discuss the disengagement of our President from the black community because he is not addressing what matters to me as a parent, mother, sister, and citizen who cares for our people. Although I work full time, I do mentor young people who are “doing the hard work” and still face challenges that impact their lives (housing, jobs, education) all while trying to survive in our cruel world. So, why should we not hold this President to the same standard as we do White Presidents before him who seek our VOTES when it benefits them?

    For those who say that the President has signed bills that impact all Americans, yes, this is true but we have concerns just like the Hispanic, Asians and Gay community-are we not equally important and valuable to him as a people who voted 97% for him; is it ok to take it for granted that the Black folk will come on out and vote for him again because he looks like us? And some might say, what choice do we have considering the other side!

    I’m not tryign to convince anyone to agree with my perspective but we can no longer turn the other cheek and look away while not being valued by someone who looks like us!

    Peace out…..

  • http://profiles.google.com/greeneink Renee Greene

    Of course, it’s okay. Especially if you are a working person who works to resolve these matters the way they are supposed to be resolved and does something besides critique and complain; and if you had these SAME issues when Bush and Clinton and Reagan and HW and Carter and Nixon were president; and they didn’t do anything about it either. There’s only been one time when the unemployment of blacks in America fell below the double-digits and that, if I got my research correct, was in the late 80s. And it’s okay if you’re doing it for the greater good and not because Obama won’t acknowledge you as black “leaders” like Clinton did. I think other administrations could stand to learn from Obama’s – black folk don’t play follow the leader any more, even though they are mighty “star struck” when it comes to who they do and don’t listen to. They’re still going to vote for who they want to, so maybe politicians need to stop playing footsies with black “leaders,” and that includes Obama.